Friday, August 21, 2020

Friction and Shoe Slide

|Name: Brennan Gedney |Date: November 16, 2011 | Graded Assignment Lab Report Answer the inquiries, utilizing total sentences. At the point when you have completed, present this task to your instructor by the due date for full credit. (9 focuses) |Score | 1. In Part 1, did the power of rubbing on the shoe rely upon the heaviness of the shoe? On the off chance that the two are connected, for what reason right? What does the slant of the line on the diagram of power of grinding versus eight speak to? Clarify utilizing your information. Answer: The frictional power depended on the heaviness of the shoe. The more mass a shoe had, the huge frictional power was required. The more weight a shoe has, the greater gravity pulls on the shoe. This implies there is a bigger ordinary power, which increased by a similar coefficient of rubbing gives a bigger frictional power. The incline of the line of rubbing versus weight speaks to the rate at which the frictional power increments because of weigh t. (8 focuses) |Score | 2. Improves on a b-ball court than a dress or move shoe? Why or why not? Clarify utilizing information from Parts 1 and 2. Answer: An athletic shoe doesn't work better than a dress shoe on a ball court. Athletic shoes have more grasp than dress shoes, and in this way require more power to move. In view of my information, the dress shoe requires less applied power to move than an athletic shoe. (8 focuses) |Score | 3. On the off chance that you needed the athletic shoe to slide quicker on a surface, what may you do to the shoe? Give at any rate two different ways to make the shoe slide quicker, and clarify as far as the power of grating and the coefficient of rubbing. Answer: To make a shoe slide quicker, you may diminish the heaviness of the shoe. This would diminish the typical power, and in this manner the power of erosion, permitting the shoe to slide quicker. Another approach to slide the shoe quicker is slide it down a slanted plane. This would diminish the coefficient of static erosion in light of the fact that the point utilized in  µs = tan ? would be littler. |Your Score |___ of 25 |

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.